[Slightly OT]: More on ints and floats
Michael Hudson
mwh at python.net
Tue Apr 8 13:27:07 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Tue Apr 8 13:27:07 EDT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): [Slightly OT]: More on ints and floats
- Next message (by thread): [Slightly OT]: More on ints and floats
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Daneliuk <tundra at tundraware.com> writes: > I am unclear, though, on whether a mathematician understands 1.0 to > mean 1.0000000... (a single number) or the _neighborhood_ around 1 > with one digit precision. I'm a mathematician, albeit not a numerical analyst, and I don't think considering a float as the interval of real numbers to which it is the closest floating point approximation is a particularly helpful point of view. Floats are perfectly normal rational numbers; it's the *operations* which are weird. Cheers, M. -- The rapid establishment of social ties, even of a fleeting nature, advance not only that goal but its standing in the uberconscious mesh of communal psychic, subjective, and algorithmic interbeing. But I fear I'm restating the obvious. -- Will Ware, comp.lang.python
- Previous message (by thread): [Slightly OT]: More on ints and floats
- Next message (by thread): [Slightly OT]: More on ints and floats
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list