Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at iinet.net.au
Thu Dec 30 09:00:31 EST 2004

• Previous message (by thread): Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python
• Next message (by thread): Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Paul Rubin wrote:
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at iinet.net.au> writes:
> 
>>Anyway, I'm looking for feedback on a def-based syntax that came up in
>>a recent c.l.p discussion:
> 
> 
> Looks like just an even more contorted version of lambda.  It doesn't
> fix lambda's main deficiency which is inability to have several
> statements in the anonymous function.

Do you consider generator expressions or list comprehensions deficient because 
they don't allow several statements in the body of the for loop?

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at email.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net

---

• Previous message (by thread): Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python
• Next message (by thread): Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list