Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at iinet.net.au
Thu Dec 30 08:28:46 EST 2004

• Previous message (by thread): Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python
• Next message (by thread): Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

GvR has commented that he want to get rid of the lambda keyword for Python 3.0. 
Getting rid of lambda seems like a worthy goal, but I'd prefer to see it dropped 
in favour of a different syntax, rather than completely losing the ability to 
have anonymous functions.

Anyway, I'm looking for feedback on a def-based syntax that came up in a recent 
c.l.p discussion:
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net/2004/12/anonymous-functions-in-python.html

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at email.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net

---

• Previous message (by thread): Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python
• Next message (by thread): Securing a future for anonymous functions in Python
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list