Add explicit .pl(lazy=True) overload by J-Meyers · Pull Request #172

Add explicit .pl(lazy=True) overload by J-Meyers · Pull Request #172 · duckdb/duckdb-python

Merged

evertlammerts merged 1 commit intoduckdb:v1.4-andiumfrom

J-Meyers:pl_lazy_typing

Nov 10, 2025

Merged

Add explicit .pl(lazy=True) overload#172
evertlammerts merged 1 commit intoduckdb:v1.4-andiumfrom
J-Meyers:pl_lazy_typing

Conversation

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor

J-Meyers commented
Nov 9, 2025

Followed: python/mypy#8634

Prior to this mypy would complain when using .pl(lazy=True).collect() this will prevent that

Add explicit polars overloads

10e0ef3

J-Meyers force-pushed the pl_lazy_typing branch from c87c7cc to 10e0ef3 Compare

November 9, 2025 00:59

Copy link Copy Markdown

Collaborator

evertlammerts commented
Nov 10, 2025

Hey @J-Meyers , thanks for the PR. I think the third (Union) overload is not necessary?

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

J-Meyers commented
Nov 10, 2025
via email

I think it still is necessary if for some reason the value of lazy is determined at runtime instead of being a simple literal. One case if this could be of you had some wrapper function around the calls to duckdb that took lazy as an argument, then that could return either lazy frames or regular.

…

________________________________ From: Evert Lammerts ***@***.***> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2025 4:09:09 AM To: duckdb/duckdb-python ***@***.***> Cc: Julian Meyers ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [duckdb/duckdb-python] Add explicit .pl(lazy=True) overload (PR #172) [https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2683350?s=20&v=4]evertlammerts left a comment (duckdb/duckdb-python#172)<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_duckdb_duckdb-2Dpython_pull_172-23issuecomment-2D3510607924&d=DwMCaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=MdlGNggs4ba2ijajU3oxJJgnT7XUUcVtAcqALzH8Cc4&m=z7ONwbMan0UnXCBdhxWWdlc5X5zfUoiJ46gCykRlbv-J07Y5j6xrH74DE1-aXsCm&s=1Yc9bQBX6rtfc7J3_sVaKEgW_9SrH3Xe2ZWjpLzpShQ&e=> Hey @J-Meyers<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_J-2DMeyers&d=DwMCaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=MdlGNggs4ba2ijajU3oxJJgnT7XUUcVtAcqALzH8Cc4&m=z7ONwbMan0UnXCBdhxWWdlc5X5zfUoiJ46gCykRlbv-J07Y5j6xrH74DE1-aXsCm&s=Qh1rh7REFMFudNkVCuZzCS8q1aVmd89KVI7IlIuvs60&e=> , thanks for the PR. I think the third (Union) overload is not necessary? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_duckdb_duckdb-2Dpython_pull_172-23issuecomment-2D3510607924&d=DwMCaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=MdlGNggs4ba2ijajU3oxJJgnT7XUUcVtAcqALzH8Cc4&m=z7ONwbMan0UnXCBdhxWWdlc5X5zfUoiJ46gCykRlbv-J07Y5j6xrH74DE1-aXsCm&s=1Yc9bQBX6rtfc7J3_sVaKEgW_9SrH3Xe2ZWjpLzpShQ&e=>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_notifications_unsubscribe-2Dauth_AM453PKN6V6RR7DMFOCUXVD34BP3ZAVCNFSM6AAAAACLRUCDNSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTKMJQGYYDOOJSGQ&d=DwMCaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=MdlGNggs4ba2ijajU3oxJJgnT7XUUcVtAcqALzH8Cc4&m=z7ONwbMan0UnXCBdhxWWdlc5X5zfUoiJ46gCykRlbv-J07Y5j6xrH74DE1-aXsCm&s=qA6Jfc-oDmaZFW5tHoRvtH62wmNEZAcgEJl83t5u9WI&e=>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.