C6x: Fix another problem with rela. and rel. sections
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Fri Oct 1 13:47:00 GMT 2010
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Oct 1 13:47:00 GMT 2010
- Previous message (by thread): PR12066
- Next message (by thread): C6x: Fix another problem with rela. and rel. sections
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > TI's compiler for C6x produces both rel. and rela. sections. When compiling > the kernel with it, we end up with rela.init.text and rel.init.text, and when > we then try to use GNU ld to link these objects together using "-r", the > linker aborts with > > ld: init/mounts.o: relocation size mismatch in init/do_mounts.o section .text > ld: final link failed: File in wrong format > > That's because in the output we've only made one of the two sections. I > looked around in other targets for ways to fix it, and came across a > definition of elf_fake_sections in elf32-m32r.c. Adding such a function to > elf32-tic6x.c seems to fix the problem. > > Ok? This appears to have caused: FAIL: ld-elf/64ksec-r regexp "^There are 680.. section headers.*:$" line "There are 102011 section headers, starting at offset 0x13e594:" (Testing for cross to c6x-elf from i686-pc-linux-gnu. 2010-09-23 16:00:00 passes, 2010-09-23 17:00:00, this is the only commit in that interval.) Please fix. When reviewing C6X patches I am presuming that they have been tested not to cause regressions for a relevant target - did this failure result from an interaction with another commit between when you tested the patch and when you committed it? -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com
- Previous message (by thread): PR12066
- Next message (by thread): C6x: Fix another problem with rela. and rel. sections
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list