Bernd Schmidt bernds@codesourcery.com
Fri Oct 1 13:51:00 GMT 2010

• Previous message (by thread): C6x: Fix another problem with rela. and rel. sections
• Next message (by thread): More rel/rela fixes for ld -r
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 10/01/2010 03:47 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> This appears to have caused:
> 
> FAIL: ld-elf/64ksec-r
> 
> regexp "^There are 680.. section headers.*:$"
> line   "There are 102011 section headers, starting at offset 0x13e594:"
> 
> (Testing for cross to c6x-elf from i686-pc-linux-gnu.  2010-09-23 16:00:00 
> passes, 2010-09-23 17:00:00, this is the only commit in that interval.)
> 
> Please fix.  When reviewing C6X patches I am presuming that they have been 
> tested not to cause regressions for a relevant target - did this failure 
> result from an interaction with another commit between when you tested the 
> patch and when you committed it?

No, I probably forgot to run the testsuite.  Sorry.  I'm currently
working on the other rel/rela patch and will make sure it's fixed.


Bernd

---

• Previous message (by thread): C6x: Fix another problem with rela. and rel. sections
• Next message (by thread): More rel/rela fixes for ld -r
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list