Issue32269
Created on 2017-12-10 17:08 by yselivanov, last changed 2017-12-11 15:08 by yselivanov. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 4782 | merged | yselivanov, 2017-12-10 17:32 | |
| Messages (2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg307961 - (view) | Author: Yury Selivanov (yselivanov) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-12-10 17:08 | |
In many contexts `asyncio._get_running_loop()` is more useful than `asyncio.get_event_loop()`. The former function is predictable and simple, the latter can change its behaviour depending on the current policy and can even create new event loops. Both `asyncio._get_running_loop()` and `asyncio._set_running_loop()` are public asyncio API, although the leading underscore suggests that they are special and shouldn't be used by regular users. That's true for `asyncio._set_running_loop()`, which is intended to be used by event loops exclusively. I propose to remove the leading underscore from `asyncio._get_running_loop()`, making it `asyncio.get_running_loop()`, and thus promoting a safer alternative to `asyncio.get_event_loop()`. `asyncio._get_running_loop()` will be deprecated and removed in Python 3.9. |
|||
| msg308051 - (view) | Author: Yury Selivanov (yselivanov) * ![]() |
Date: 2017-12-11 15:08 | |
> `asyncio._get_running_loop()` will be deprecated and removed in Python 3.9. _get_running_loop() was left as-is. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-12-11 15:08:52 | yselivanov | set | messages: + msg308051 |
| 2017-12-11 15:08:02 | yselivanov | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2017-12-10 17:32:05 | yselivanov | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: patch review pull_requests: + pull_request4683 |
| 2017-12-10 17:08:56 | yselivanov | set | type: enhancement components: + asyncio versions: + Python 3.7 |
| 2017-12-10 17:08:44 | yselivanov | create | |
