[3.6] bpo-31106: Fix handling of erros in posix_fallocate() and posix_fadvise() (GH-3000) (GH-3000) by miss-islington · Pull Request #4101 · python/cpython

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in

Appearance settings

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up

Appearance settings

Conversation

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented

Oct 24, 2017

edited by bedevere-bot

Loading

(cherry picked from commit d4b93e2)

https://bugs.python.org/issue31106

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

@socketpair and @larryhastings: Backport status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

1 similar comment

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

@socketpair and @larryhastings: Backport status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@socketpair

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor

Well, what should I do ? I have no access to this branch.

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

@socketpair and @larryhastings: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@Mariatta

Copy link Copy Markdown

Member

I just saw the comment in the bpo, seems like a news entry is needed.
I'll remove the skip news label. @socketpair, can you create a new backport PR that includes the news entry? I can then close this PR.

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

@socketpair and @larryhastings: Backport status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@socketpair

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor

What can I do in order to merge this branch to Python 3.6 ?

@Mariatta

Copy link Copy Markdown

Member

@socketpair Please create your own backport PR and add the news entry there..

@asvetlov

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor

Original PR was merged without NEWS, let's add the record in separate PR

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

@socketpair and @larryhastings: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@asvetlov asvetlov merged commit 3a04c52 into python:3.6

Feb 1, 2018

@bedevere-bot

Copy link Copy Markdown

@asvetlov: Please replace # with GH- in the commit message next time. Thanks!

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor Author

Thanks, @asvetlov!

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-d4b93e2-3.6 branch

February 1, 2018 14:07

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

skip news type-bug

An unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@miss-islington @socketpair @Mariatta @asvetlov @bedevere-bot @the-knights-who-say-ni