Support raw-dylib link kind on ELF by Noratrieb · Pull Request #135695 · rust-lang/rust
rustbot
added
A-compiletest
labels
Jan 18, 2025
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
label
Mar 3, 2025bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request
Mar 3, 2025Support raw-dylib link kind on ELF raw-dylib is a link kind that allows rustc to link against a library without having any library files present. This currently only exists on Windows. rustc will take all the symbols from raw-dylib link blocks and put them in an import library, where they can then be resolved by the linker. While import libraries don't exist on ELF, it would still be convenient to have this same functionality. Not having the libraries present at build-time can be convenient for several reasons, especially cross-compilation. With raw-dylib, code linking against a library can be cross-compiled without needing to have these libraries available on the build machine. If the libc crate makes use of this, it would allow cross-compilation without having any libc available on the build machine. This is not yet possible with this implementation, at least against libc's like glibc that use symbol versioning. The raw-dylib kind could be extended with support for symbol versioning in the future. This implementation is very experimental and I have not tested it very well. I have tested it for a toy example and the lz4-sys crate, where it was able to successfully link a binary despite not having a corresponding library at build-time. I was inspired by Björn's comments in https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/bundle-zig-cc-in-rustup-by-default/22096/27 Tracking issue: rust-lang#135694 r? bjorn3 try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: x86_64-msvc-1 try-job: x86_64-msvc-2 try-job: test-various
tgross35 added a commit to tgross35/rust that referenced this pull request
Mar 3, 2025Support raw-dylib link kind on ELF raw-dylib is a link kind that allows rustc to link against a library without having any library files present. This currently only exists on Windows. rustc will take all the symbols from raw-dylib link blocks and put them in an import library, where they can then be resolved by the linker. While import libraries don't exist on ELF, it would still be convenient to have this same functionality. Not having the libraries present at build-time can be convenient for several reasons, especially cross-compilation. With raw-dylib, code linking against a library can be cross-compiled without needing to have these libraries available on the build machine. If the libc crate makes use of this, it would allow cross-compilation without having any libc available on the build machine. This is not yet possible with this implementation, at least against libc's like glibc that use symbol versioning. The raw-dylib kind could be extended with support for symbol versioning in the future. This implementation is very experimental and I have not tested it very well. I have tested it for a toy example and the lz4-sys crate, where it was able to successfully link a binary despite not having a corresponding library at build-time. I was inspired by Björn's comments in https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/bundle-zig-cc-in-rustup-by-default/22096/27 Tracking issue: rust-lang#135694 r? bjorn3 try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: x86_64-msvc-1 try-job: x86_64-msvc-2 try-job: test-various
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
and removed S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.labels
Mar 3, 2025
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
and removed S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.labels
Mar 3, 2025This was referenced
Mar 3, 2025tgross35 added a commit to tgross35/rust that referenced this pull request
Mar 4, 2025Support raw-dylib link kind on ELF raw-dylib is a link kind that allows rustc to link against a library without having any library files present. This currently only exists on Windows. rustc will take all the symbols from raw-dylib link blocks and put them in an import library, where they can then be resolved by the linker. While import libraries don't exist on ELF, it would still be convenient to have this same functionality. Not having the libraries present at build-time can be convenient for several reasons, especially cross-compilation. With raw-dylib, code linking against a library can be cross-compiled without needing to have these libraries available on the build machine. If the libc crate makes use of this, it would allow cross-compilation without having any libc available on the build machine. This is not yet possible with this implementation, at least against libc's like glibc that use symbol versioning. The raw-dylib kind could be extended with support for symbol versioning in the future. This implementation is very experimental and I have not tested it very well. I have tested it for a toy example and the lz4-sys crate, where it was able to successfully link a binary despite not having a corresponding library at build-time. I was inspired by Björn's comments in https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/bundle-zig-cc-in-rustup-by-default/22096/27 Tracking issue: rust-lang#135694 r? bjorn3 try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: x86_64-msvc-1 try-job: x86_64-msvc-2 try-job: test-various
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request
Mar 4, 2025Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#135695 (Support raw-dylib link kind on ELF) - rust-lang#137836 (Set `target_vendor = "openwrt"` on `mips64-openwrt-linux-musl`) - rust-lang#137913 (Allow struct field default values to reference struct's generics) - rust-lang#137949 (Update MSVC INSTALL.md instructions to recommend VS 2022 + recent Windows 10/11 SDK) - rust-lang#137963 (Add ``dyn`` keyword to `E0373` examples) - rust-lang#137975 (Remove unused `PpMode::needs_hir`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
label
Sep 6, 2025This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters