Explain why we retroactively change a static initializer to have a different type by oli-obk · Pull Request #136426 · rust-lang/rust
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
labels
Feb 2, 2025
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
and removed S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.labels
Feb 2, 2025bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request
Feb 2, 2025…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#136145 (Test validity of pattern types) - rust-lang#136339 (CompileTest: Add Directives to Ignore `arm-unknown-*` Targets) - rust-lang#136403 (Fix malformed error annotations in a UI test) - rust-lang#136414 (Shorten error message for callable with wrong return type) - rust-lang#136425 (Move `rustc_middle::infer::unify_key`) - rust-lang#136426 (Explain why we retroactively change a static initializer to have a different type) - rust-lang#136445 (Couple of cleanups to DiagCtxt and EarlyDiagCtxt) - rust-lang#136452 (Miri subtree update) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request
Feb 2, 2025…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#136145 (Test validity of pattern types) - rust-lang#136339 (CompileTest: Add Directives to Ignore `arm-unknown-*` Targets) - rust-lang#136403 (Fix malformed error annotations in a UI test) - rust-lang#136414 (Shorten error message for callable with wrong return type) - rust-lang#136425 (Move `rustc_middle::infer::unify_key`) - rust-lang#136426 (Explain why we retroactively change a static initializer to have a different type) - rust-lang#136445 (Couple of cleanups to DiagCtxt and EarlyDiagCtxt) - rust-lang#136452 (Miri subtree update) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request
Feb 3, 2025Rollup merge of rust-lang#136426 - oli-obk:push-nkpuulwurykn, r=compiler-errors Explain why we retroactively change a static initializer to have a different type I keep getting confused about it and in turn confused `@GuillaumeGomez` while trying to explain it badly
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters