---

---

• To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
• Subject: Re: Kaffe porting issues
• From: Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe@orcus.priv.at>
• Date: 17 Jan 2002 12:52:47 +0100
• Message-id: <[🔎] 877kqhnqi8.fsf@orcus.priv.at>
• In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1011141703.2480.10.camel@debian>
• References: <20011212193422.A43041C186@minerva.progeny.com> <1008790242.13391.40.camel@sarge> <20011219202405.5842D1C1C9@minerva.progeny.com> <[🔎] 87advfd04x.fsf@orcus.priv.at> <[🔎] 1011141703.2480.10.camel@debian>

---

Ean Schuessler <ean@brainfood.com> writes:

> Any thoughts on version numbers? I was thinking something like:
> 
> kaffe_1:1.0.6-cvs20020115_arch

Sounds good. In the only package where I track CVS I use a "+" after
the last released version to signify that this is the old version
/plus/ something more. Just a niggly detail ...

-- 
Robbe

Attachment: signature.ng
Description: PGP signature

---

Reply to:

• debian-java@lists.debian.org
• Robert Bihlmeyer (on-list)
• Robert Bihlmeyer (off-list)

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Kaffe porting issues
    • From: Takashi Okamoto <toraneko@kun.ne.jp>

• References:
  • Re: Kaffe porting issues
    • From: Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe@orcus.priv.at>
  • Re: Kaffe porting issues
    • From: Ean Schuessler <ean@brainfood.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: Kaffe porting issues
• Next by Date: Re: Kaffe porting issues
• Previous by thread: Re: Kaffe porting issues
• Next by thread: Re: Kaffe porting issues
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread