A Carmichael number is an odd composite number
which satisfies Fermat's little theorem
|
(1) |
for every choice of satisfying
(i.e.,
and
are relatively prime)
with
.
A Carmichael number is therefore a pseudoprime to
any base. Carmichael numbers therefore cannot be found to be composite
using Fermat's little theorem. However,
if
,
the congruence of Fermat's little theorem
is nonzero, thus identifying a Carmichael number
as composite.
Carmichael numbers are sometimes called "absolute pseudoprimes" and also satisfy Korselt's criterion. R. D. Carmichael first noted the existence of such numbers in 1910, computed 15 examples, and conjectured that there were infinitely many. In 1956, Erdős sketched a technique for constructing large Carmichael numbers (Hoffman 1998, p. 183), and a proof was given by Alford et al. (1994).
Any solution to Lehmer's totient problem must be a Carmichael number.
The first few Carmichael numbers are 561, 1105, 1729, 2465, 2821, 6601, 8911, 10585, 15841, 29341, ... (OEIS A002997). The number
of Carmichael numbers less than ,
, ... are 0, 1, 7, 16, 43, 105, ... (OEIS A055553;
Pinch 1993). The smallest Carmichael numbers having 3, 4, ... factors are
,
, 825265, 321197185, ... (OEIS
A006931).
Carmichael numbers have at least three prime factors. For Carmichael numbers with exactly three prime factors, once one of the primes
has been specified, there are only a finite number of Carmichael numbers which can
be constructed. Indeed, for Carmichael numbers with prime factors, there are only a finite number with the least
specified.
Numbers of the form are Carmichael numbers if each of the factors
is prime (Korselt 1899, Ore 1988, Guy 1994). This
can be seen since for
|
(2) |
is a multiple of
and the least common multiple of
,
, and
is
, so
modulo each of the primes
,
, and
, hence
modulo their product. The first few such Carmichael
numbers correspond to
, 6, 35, 45, 51, 55, 56, ... (OEIS A046025)
and are 1729, 294409, 56052361, 118901521, ... (OEIS A033502).
Let
denote the number of Carmichael numbers less than
. Then, for all sufficiently large
,
|
(3) |
(Alford et al. 1994), which proves that there are infinitely many Carmichael numbers. The upper bound
|
(4) |
has also been proved (R. G. E. Pinch).
The Carmichael numbers have the following properties:
1. If a prime divides the Carmichael number
, then
implies that
.
2. Every Carmichael number is squarefree.
3. An odd composite squarefree number is a Carmichael number iff
divides the denominator of
the Bernoulli number
.
The largest known Carmichael numbers having a given number of factors are summarized in the following table (updated from Dubner 1989, 1998).
| factors | digits | discoverer |
| 3 | 60351 | Broadhurst (2002) |
| 4 | 29094 | Broadhurst 2003 (Broadhurst 2015b) |
| 5 | 1015 | Caldwell and Dubner |
| 6 | 19140 | Broadhurst 2003 (Broadhurst 2015a) |
See also
Carmichael Condition, Lehmer's Totient Problem, Pseudoprime
Explore with Wolfram|Alpha
References
Alford, W. R.; Granville, A.; and Pomerance, C. "There are Infinitely Many Carmichael Numbers." Ann. Math. 139, 703-722,
1994.Beyer, W. H. CRC
Standard Mathematical Tables, 28th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, p. 87,
1987.Broadhurst, D. "60351-digit 3-Carmichael number." 2 Dec
2002. http://listserv.nodak.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind0212&L=nmbrthry&P=R2.Broadhurst,
D. "Re: 14241 digits 5-Carmichael number." 29 Aug 2015a. https://listserv.nodak.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind1508&L=NMBRTHRY&P=R628.Broadhurst,
D. "Re: 25791 digits 4-Carmichael number." 29 Aug 2015b. https://listserv.nodak.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind1508&L=NMBRTHRY&P=6285.Carlini,
A. and Hosoya, A. "Carmichael Numbers on a Quantum Computer." 5 Aug 1999.
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9908022.Carmichael,
R. D. "Note on a New Number Theory Function." Bull. Amer. Math.
Soc. 16, 232-238, 1910.Dubner, H. "A New Method for
Producing Large Carmichael Numbers." Math. Comput. 53, 411-414,
1989.Dubner, H. "Carmichael Number Record." 11 Sep 1998. http://listserv.nodak.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind9809&L=NMBRTHRY&P=795.Guy,
R. K. "Carmichael Numbers." §A13 in Unsolved
Problems in Number Theory, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 30-32,
1994.Hoffman, P. The
Man Who Loved Only Numbers: The Story of Paul Erdős and the Search for Mathematical
Truth. New York: Hyperion, pp. 182-183, 1998.Korselt, A.
"Problème chinois." L'intermédiaire math. 6,
143-143, 1899.Ore, Ø. Number
Theory and Its History. New York: Dover, 1988.Pinch, R. G. E.
"The Carmichael Numbers up to ." Math. Comput. 61, 381-391, 1993a.Pinch,
R. G. E. "Some Primality Testing Algorithms." Not. Amer. Math.
Soc. 40, 1203-1210, 1993b.Pinch, R. G. E. ftp://ftp.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/pub/Carmichael/table.Pomerance,
C.; Selfridge, J. L.; and Wagstaff, S. S. Jr. "The Pseudoprimes
to
."
Math. Comput. 35, 1003-1026, 1980.Ribenboim, P. The
New Book of Prime Number Records. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 118-125,
1996.Riesel, H. Prime
Numbers and Computer Methods for Factorization, 2nd ed. Basel: Birkhäuser,
pp. 89-90 and 94-95, 1994.Shanks, D. Solved
and Unsolved Problems in Number Theory, 4th ed. New York: Chelsea, p. 116,
1993.Sloane, N. J. A. Sequences A002997/M5462,
A006931/M5463, A033502,
A046025, and A055553
in "The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences."
Referenced on Wolfram|Alpha
Cite this as:
Weisstein, Eric W. "Carmichael Number." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Resource. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/CarmichaelNumber.html